Monday, December 26, 2011

Exclusive: Afghanistan sets ground rules for Taliban talks (Reuters)

KABUL (Reuters) ? Afghanistan will accept a Taliban liaison office in Qatar to start peace talks but no foreign power can get involved in the process without its consent, the government's peace council said, as efforts gather pace to find a solution to the decade-long war.

Afghanistan's High Peace Council, in a note to foreign missions, has set out ground rules for engaging the Taliban after Kabul grew concerned that the United States and Qatar, helped by Germany, had secretly agreed with the Taliban to open an office in the Qatari capital, Doha.

U.S. officials have held about half a dozen meetings with their insurgent contacts, mostly in Germany and Doha with representatives of Mullah Omar, leader of the Taliban's Quetta Shura, this year to prepare the way for face-to-face talks between the group and the Afghan government.

A representative office for the group is considered the starting point for such talks and Doha has in the past served as a meeting ground for initial contacts.

But the Afghan peace commission which has suffered a series of setbacks including the assassination of its head in September said that negotiations with the Taliban could only begin after they stopped violence against civilians, cut ties to al Qaeda, and accepted the Afghan constitution which guarantees civil rights and liberties, including rights for women.

The council, according to a copy of the 11-point note made available to Reuters, also said any peace process with the Taliban would have to have the support of Pakistan since members of the insurgent group were based there.

"The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is in agreement regarding the opening of an office for the armed opposition, but only to move forward the peace process and conduct negotiations," the council said.

The government would prefer such an office in either Saudi Arabia or Turkey, both of which it is close to, but was not averse to Doha as long as the authority of the Afghan state was not eroded and the office was only established for talks, officials said.

"We are saying Saudi or Turkey are preferable, we are not saying it has to be there only. The only condition is it should be in an Islamic country," said a government official.

President Hamid Karzai's administration recalled its ambassador from Doha last week, apparently angry that it had been kept in the dark about the latest round of contacts with the insurgent group.

Officials said Kabul was also deeply concerned about reports that the United States was considering the transfer of a small number of Afghan prisoners from Guantanamo Bay military prison to Doha as a prelude to the talks.

"We are a sovereign country, we have laws. How can you transfer our prisoners from one country to another. Already it's a violation to have them in Guantanamo Bay," the official said.

The Afghan government wanted the prisoners to be returned to its custody, the official said.

Reuters reported this month that the United States was considering the transfer of an unspecified number of Taliban prisoners from Guantanamo Bay into Afghan government custody as part of accelerating, high-stakes diplomacy.

"We have no problem with this. In fact we have been demanding this for a while. These are Afghan prisoners," said the official, who declined to be identified.

The tension between the Karzai administration and the United States over engaging the Taliban underscores the challenges of seeking a political settlement as the West prepares to withdraw most combat troops from the country by 2014.

Efforts to engage the insurgent group have faced a string of setbacks, the most recent being the assassination of the head of the peace council and former president, Burhanuddin Rabbani, in September at the hands of a suicide bomber who pretended to be a Taliban emissary.

HARDENING OF POSITIONS

It led to a hardening of positions with Karzai saying the government could not talk to suicide bombers and that there should be an address for the Taliban so that negotiators know they are talking to the right representatives.

"We are committed to the reconciliation process, the experience of the last 10 years shows no military solution is possible. Talking to the armed opposition is the key in this regard," said presidential spokesman Aimal Faizi.

The peace council, laying down the markers for engagement with the Taliban, said well known figures from both the Taliban and the government had to be involved in talks.

It said that "before any negotiations can take place, violence against Afghan people must stop and that the armed opposition must cut ties to al Qaeda and other terrorist groups."

It also said that the Taliban must accept the constitution and honor the gains made in the last 10 years since they were ousted from power, conditions that the Taliban have shown no sign of accepting.

The Taliban do not accept the constitution and have vowed to carry on fighting until all foreign troops have left the country.

The peace council said Pakistani support was necessary for talks to take place, another condition that makes the task harder because of fraught ties between the United States and Pakistan which fears it is being shut out of the process.

Opening a Taliban office in a third country is seen as a way to create distance from Pakistan which has longstanding ties to the insurgent group.

But the government official said he did not think the peace council had laid down such tough conditions that the talks would fail even before they started.

"We don't think it's a deal breaker. We are quite optimistic," he said.

(Editing by Robert Birsel and Ed Lane)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/asia/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111226/wl_nm/us_afghanistan_talks

heisman finalists kepler 22 b kepler 22 b rosie o donnell st nicholas st nicholas mindy mccready

Case audit reveals flaws in legal system - The Nation

Home ? national ? Case audit reveals flaws in legal system


Don Pathan
The Nation
Pattani
December 24, 2011 8:24 pm

Speaking at a seminar on Saturday during which a report that examined 100 legal cases that was audit by the Muslim Attorney Centre Foundation and the American Bar Association's Rule of Law Initiative, experts said the entire sysem needs to be seriously examined. Out fo the 100 cases studied, 72 were dismissed, all on the ground of insufficient evidence.

Vast majority of the suspects were charged with terrorism, unlike the separatist conflict in the 1970s and 1980s when militatns were charged with treason.

Thailand employed special laws - Emergency Law and Martial Law - that permits detention up to 37 days without formal charges. Suspects are almost incommunicado the entire time.

From the Martial Law, there were 39 cases of tortured and 27 cases of verbal abuses. From those held under Emergency Law, 37 were tortured, while 25 experienced verbal abuses. The same kind of treatment also existed under normal legal proceeding.

Most of the suspects are locked during the cases that can take anywhere form one to two years, or even three years, before the verdict is read.

Pairote Polpetch, a member of the Legal Reform Committee, said the problem lies with the authorities unwillingness to question cases that are sensitive in nature and decided to pass it on.

Moreover, the lengthy detention period, which is not subjected to any examination, may leads to questionable and illegal interrogation tactics, such as torture, as the authorities tries to obtain information form the suspects.

International Crises Group's Rungrawee Chalerm-pinyorat asked whether this is a problem exclusively for the south or for the entire country.

Moreover, quoting a senior police officer, there is the feeling that without these special laws, rogue officials may employ controversial and illegal means, such as abduction and consequently murder of suspects.

She said the violence in the deep South was political in nature but Thai legal process does not take this into consideration.

The government also employed Article 21 to give incentive to insurgents to lay down their arms. But the scheme failed to attract much participations because, said senior government officials in the region, the militants see themselves as winning. Such process is reserved for post-conflict period and should be use as a way to reintegrate the insurgents back into the society.

Pairote said the judge and the Office of the Attorney General just be more vigorous in screening and demanding more solid evidence from the law enforcement officers.

"They can help filter the process at the early stage instead of waiting until the legal process exhausted itself," Pairote said.

One senior officer in the region said there is a concerned that many of the suspects who had been locked up for a year or two would come out with extreme anger and then join the movement.

Participants urged the authorities to investigate the alleged torture and abuses, saying faith in the government lies with the sincerity of the officials and justice system.

Latest stories in this category


Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Case-audit-reveals-flaws-in-legal-system-30172605.html

teresa giudice red ribbon week much ado about nothing sean hayes caroline manzo caroline manzo the haunting in connecticut

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Motorola Wins Against Apple

Motorola recently experienced victory as the company won against Apple regarding a patent case filed in Germany.

Motorola, the Android-based smartphone manufacturer filed the patent case against Apple when the company filed to license one of the wireless intellectual properties that the company utilizes. This intellectual property is included in the technology used by Apple in their iPhone and 3G iPad devices. This case is also related to a patent claimed by Motorola which is a "method for performing a countdown function during a mobile-originated transfer for a packet radio system." Motorola licenses their patent to other companies on FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) terms. Since Apple lost this case, Motorola could try to force Apple to remove this feature from the devices that they offer or opt to stop sales in Germany.

Motorola expressed its contentment regarding the court decision in a statement released by Scott Offer, senior VP and general counsel of Motorola Mobility. Offer said that "We (Motorola) will continue to take all necessary steps to protect our intellectual property, as the company's patent portfolio and licensing agreements with companies both in the US and around the world are critical to our business. We have been negotiating with Apple and offering reasonable licensing terms and conditions since 2007, and will continue our efforts to resolve our global patent dispute as soon as practicable."

Companies who own a Frand-type patent is under obligation to license out their technology to third-parties due to the fact that this invention is considered to be "essential" to an industry standard. Apple had previously expressed their willingness to pay a Frand-set fee in the future as well as paying a similar rate for past infringements. Despite Apple's willingness to pay the needed fees, the company lost because it attempted to "retain the right to contest the validity of the patent with a view to past damages". Apple decided to go with this strategy because Motorola defended the company's right to charge an above-Frand rate to Apple for the past four years.?

Like us on Facebook

On the other hand, Apple expressed its discontent regarding the court's decision. Apple said that "we're (Apple) going to appeal the court's ruling right away. Holiday shoppers in Germany should have no problem finding the iPad or iPhone they want."

Source: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/272434/20111224/motorola-apple-patent-case.htm

surrogates james garner veteran aircraft carrier apocalypse now happy veterans day happy veterans day

Melanie Amaro Expresses Shock, Appreciation Over X Factor Victory


Melanie Amaro accomplished the very difficult on the first season of The X Factor: the front-runner since day one, this talented singer maintained that status for months and went on to win the title last night.

And she still can't believe it.

"I felt as though I was hearing things, to be honest," Amaro told reporters today of when Steve Jones announced her at the winner. "I had to check my ear real quick. It shocked me a lot. It really did."

Melanie Amaro Wins!

Melanie, of course, is now $5 million richer, a wild sum for anyone, let alone a young woman who didn't grow up with much.

"Life will change a lot," she says. "The most I have ever had before was $200, if I was lucky."

A piano teacher from Florida, Amaro says she'll purchase a new home for her mother with the winnings, along with a lifetime supply of chicken for herself. Seriously. ("I can't live without it. It's my favorite food.")

Overall, she just wants to give a shout-out to her fans.

"Thank you to all my supporters who've supported me and have been behind me since day one and believed in me when I didn't even have the heart to believe in myself," she says. "Even when I went home, you guys still pushed and sent all your love my way."

You're welcome, Melanie! Did do you think Amaro deserved to win?



Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/12/melanie-amaro-expresses-shock-appreciation-over-x-factor-victory/

orcl 2012 nfl mock draft hanukkah gpa calculator menorah derrick rose snooki

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Friday, December 23, 2011

Shootings in Mexico's Veracruz kill 16

At least 11 people were killed by an armed gang on Thursday in the Mexican Gulf coast state of Veracruz, where drug-related violence flared this autumn, before five gunmen were shot dead by security forces.

  1. Only on msnbc.com

    1. Boehner announces deal with Reid on end to payroll tax impasse
    2. Was Shroud created in a flash? Claims rise again
    3. Pie 'N Burger Ian Horn for msnbc.com Small businesses see D.C. as big threat
    4. Image: Huguette Clark Gower AP Tax fraud claimed in Huguette Clark estate
    5. How prostitution and raw milk could give Ron Paul problems
    6. Despite ?Don?t Ask? repeal, some gays still don?t tell
    7. A contagion of conflict in China?

A spokeswoman for the state government told local television the gunmen killed four people in the small town of El Higo then attacked three buses on a highway about 60 miles southwest of the port of Tampico, killing seven others.

Five armed men were killed in a shootout with security forces, the spokeswoman said.

Story: Mexico disbands entire police force in top port of Veracruz

Mexican authorities in October blamed a surge of killings in the city of Veracruz ? some 300 miles south of Tampico ? on a group linked to the country's most powerful drug lord, Joaquin "Shorty" Guzman.

Guzman has been fighting a turf war with the violent Zetas cartel, which authorities say controls Veracruz.

More than 45,000 people have been killed since President Felipe Calderon launched a war on drug cartels in late 2006.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Advertise | AdChoices Advertise | AdChoices Advertise | AdChoices

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45770652/ns/world_news-americas/

maps directions josephine baker pumpkin patch troy polamalu boo at the zoo when is daylight savings time 2011 when is daylight savings time 2011